蔚蓝晴空，今井日正当中，今井中年男子尼尔与家人在墨西哥的度假胜地，享受奢华的悠閒假期。白天在泳池边小酌，晚餐与乐手暗送秋波，一切都十分惬意，直到手机铃声划破空气。电话那头母亲病况危急，大家只好收拾行李，搭上下一班回国的飞机，不料尼尔在登机口找不到护照，只能与家人分道扬镳。走出机 场，尼尔搭上计程车，开往的却不是回饭店的方向，而是市区的破烂旅社⋯⋯。继夺下威尼斯影展评审团大奖的《美丽新秩序》后，导演米歇尔法兰科再度以家乡贫富悬殊的纷乱治安为衬底，带来看似轻鬆写意却暗潮汹涌的家庭剧，二度进军威尼斯影展正式竞赛。提姆罗斯冷淡疏离，充满上流馀裕；夏绿蒂甘斯柏躁动不安，不时紧绷焦虑，情绪来往的强烈对比，勾起观者更多好奇。情节曲折，线索散落，主角的真实动机且待拼凑。潮退潮起，日升日落，生命的转折路口，一瞬之间就大有不同。
回复 :蚌城的热血青年周南（沐桐 饰）受市场管理员李大光（安泽豪饰）之托，协助其一同寻找丢失的养女李言。随着调查深入，诸多线索都指向当地以老九为首的人口贩卖团伙，李大光为找回女儿不择手段，甚至在与周南反目后独自向老九寻仇。同时一直在调查老九的警察赵嘉（胡子程 饰）也找到周南，和其一起找回失踪的李言并揭开了李大光一段不为人知的往事。
ΤΨ
回复 :黑社会老大阿关（梁家辉 饰）事业不错，家庭却一塌糊涂：儿子Sid（房祖名 饰）是个摇滚叛逆青年，一心想继承老爸的事业；女儿Sina（何超仪 饰）是宠物医生，和同事Michael谈恋爱，和老爸的生活格格不入。Sid因为抢另外一个帮会老大老马（曾江 饰）的女人Carmen（郑希怡 饰），不得不逃到台湾偏僻的山区避难，和他一起的还有阿关的得力助手阿照（张耀扬 饰）在台湾，Sid加入了禅鼓山人，改名阿道，认识了鼓队中的女孩红豆（李心洁 饰），在鼓队朴素的生活中获得了心灵的平静；阿照也在社区学校上课，找到了人生的目标。在香港，因为Sid的出逃，阿关生意受到了影响，但也因此和女儿Sina和解，接受了她的生活和感情。同时，禅鼓山人世界巡演开始，第一站就是香港。当Sid和父亲阿关渐渐互相了解，开始冰释前嫌，阿关却在监狱中被暗杀。Sid简单的生活被打破，社团的生意、和老马的恩怨接踵而至，他如何面对这一切？
回复 :The subtitle of Jean-Marie Straub and Danièle Huillet’s first feature, from 1965, “Only Violence Helps Where Violence Reigns,” suggests the fierce political program evoked by their rigorous aesthetic. The pretext of the film, set in Cologne, is Heinrich Böll’s novel “Billiards at Half Past Nine,” which they strip down to a handful of stark events and film with a confrontational angularity akin to Bartók’s music that adorns the soundtrack. The subtlest of cues accompany the story’s complex flashbacks. The middle-aged Robert Fähmel tells a young hotel bellhop of persecutions under the Third Reich; his elderly father, Heinrich, an architect famed for a local abbey, recalls the militarism of the First World War, when his wife, Johanna, incurred trouble for insulting the Kaiser. A third-generation Fähmel is considering architecture, just as the exiled brother of Robert’s late wife, returns, only to be met by their former torturer, now a West German official taking part in a celebratory parade of war veterans. Straub and Huillet make the layers of history live in the present tense, which they judge severely. The tamped-down acting and the spare, tense visual rhetoric suggest a state of moral crisis as well as the response—as much in style as in substance—that it demands.
