向鼎
发表于6分钟前回复 :警界的秘密武器,在林立的高楼间低飞穿梭,火力足以轰掉半个城市。一群警界败类,企图利用它作不法勾当,驾驶法兰克因知情而被诬陷追杀,他决定突破重围,扫荡罪犯。蓝色霹雳是被科学家研制出来的一种特殊的经过改良的直升飞机,它本被作为辅助警察工作的工具,但在经过武装之后却被设计成为一种用来镇压街头叛乱的秘密武器,其火力足以摧毁众多巨型建筑甚至城市。蓝色霹雳设计完善后,它的研发者们想要试验它的威力,却必须要训练一个飞行员,于是他们找到了洛杉矶警察弗兰克·墨菲。墨菲接受了训练,并懂得如何在城市中运用这架新型飞机。但在飞回越南的过程中,墨菲却和该方案的飞行员产生了分歧,随着他们的矛盾加深,墨菲开始怀疑这架蓝色霹雳真正的用途并不如自己所告知的一样,有人正想利用它进行不法勾当,他开始遭到追杀,而一场较量也开始拉开序幕。
蔡卓妍
发表于8分钟前回复 :A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb