剧情简介
这是一部温情治愈系公路电影。讲述关系疏远、午夜有隔阂的父女通过一场意外之旅，午夜一同成长并修补关系的故事。影片聚焦社会普遍存在的亲子关系问题，让那些在原生家庭中受情感创伤的“孩子们”尝试与过去和解，使那些心存愧疚与遗憾的“父亲们”得到心灵的抚慰，恰如影片中的这对“问题父女”，他们在“笑中有泪”“意外频出”的旅途中，重拾信任，彼此治愈。
午夜影视18岁禁止进
这是一部温情治愈系公路电影。讲述关系疏远、午夜有隔阂的父女通过一场意外之旅，午夜一同成长并修补关系的故事。影片聚焦社会普遍存在的亲子关系问题，让那些在原生家庭中受情感创伤的“孩子们”尝试与过去和解，使那些心存愧疚与遗憾的“父亲们”得到心灵的抚慰，恰如影片中的这对“问题父女”，他们在“笑中有泪”“意外频出”的旅途中，重拾信任，彼此治愈。
柳成奎
回复 :在这部影片中，杰森已经经过“超级礼品”的考验，承继了爷爷瑞德十亿美元的产业，不过杰森过得并不好，他一边要办理爷爷的基金，一边还要和贪婪的亲属打官司，甚至连女朋友要出国的事都顾不上。女朋友走后，杰森总算承受不住压力，跑去找爷爷的老友寻求协助。在那里杰森得到了一本爷爷的日记，为了跟爷爷相同拥有一个超级人生，他开始阅览爷爷的日记。日记从1941年9月3日开端，那时爷爷瑞德仍是一个十几岁的孩子，他跟着另外两个人一同搭火车去外地营生。之后日记里还记录了瑞德做小帮工的阅历，他向他人请教成功的办法、遇到自个心爱的女孩、还有参军的阅历等等。这些曩昔就像放影片相同在杰森眼前逐个闪过。经过日记，杰森知道到爷爷从前也在金钱面前迷失过，但他终究理解了亲情和家人才是最重要的产业。爷爷的曩昔带给杰森很大的牵动和启示，所以他也开端去发明归于自个的超级人生。
张曼莉
回复 :Sam (Matthew Broderick) is the reasonable man in a crazy urban world, the man of thoughtfulness and refined taste in a landscape of Leroy Neiman paintings and beer commercials. The guy would sooner cook for an hour over a hot stove than say `supersize it.'By day he's a store clerk in an upscale gourmet eatery, and these scenes raise a smile, especially for anyone who's visited the actual chain in New York City -- the portrayal isn't far off from the reality. Our man is besieged by hoards of customers who want their imported French cheese cut to impossibly exact standards. His efforts to remain outwardly polite (while you know he'd like to take the cleaver to the relentless clientele) are pretty funny, and will warm the hearts of clerks everywhere. In general, Broderick is in good form and provides the movie with most of whatever lightness it possesses.Sciorra's lovelorn dental hygienist, Ellen, is fine enough, too, and her unknowing interaction with our cheese-slicing hero shows some hopeful chemistry, and you may begin to feel you want to see these two get together.One of the main competitors for our lady's affections, a stockbroker (Kevin Anderson), is played as caricature he's the beer swilling frat-boy whose idea of after-sex sensitivity is flipping on the football game. He's kind of funny at times, but the movie might be stronger if he was written or acted for us to like him more, instead of having us merely recognize him as the flat-out `wrong' guy in comparison to Broderick's sensitive man. Think of John Candy in Splash, taking a cigarette and beer can to the racquetball game; we know his lifestyle is not the one our hero should emulate, but we can't help but be charmed by the likeable goon. Whereas this character is merely a goon, and pretty unlikable all around.While it's a nice enough light movie for the first half, for me the story was somewhat derailed by its unbelievable (Hollywood) presentation of sex and adultery. (SPOILER AHEAD, skip to next paragraph.) When Ellen returns home after an evening's misadventures, she is naturally faced with the questioning husband (Michael Mantell). Quickly admitting her own indiscretion, she then immediately turns the situation around, demanding to know why the guy had gone ahead and bought a house without discussing it. Granted, it's a valid issue, and granted, many people use this countering maneuver in arguments. What's unbelievable is what happens next the guy starts responding to her question, addressing the house-issue in a quiet, thoughtful manner. WHOA. You'd be hard pressed to find a married person in the world who, when faced with hisher partner's totally unexpected adultery, would be ready to address anything so calmly. The guy would surely be bouncing off the walls, or else crushed into silence and tears - but see, then we might actually feel for the poor schnook, and we'd see Sciorra's character in a poor light. And since that particular audience reaction doesn't serve the romantic comedy, the story tries to sneak around it. You may start to feel that, like the husband, you're being taken.Further dissatisfaction is just around the corner in the ending. We realize this is where misunderstandings will get sorted out, and our couple will finally see a clear path to one another. We want the satisfaction of rooting for them. But it's marred by another unbelievable character reaction, followed by an abrupt conclusion that feels rushed and forced, too easy and unearned. You may feel as though the movie's cheating on you again...
王歌慧
回复 :伊莎贝拉经营着自己的沙龙，敢于表达自己内心的想法，而托马斯王子管理着自己的国家，并且即将成婚，但却只是出于职责而非爱情。伊丝和她的造型师伙伴们获得千载难逢的机会，为皇室婚礼做发型，在此期间她和托马斯王子意识到，要掌控自己的命运，就要跟随自己的心。
