剧情简介
奥斯卡·伊萨克将出演新片《一生》(Life Itself，星猫险暂译)，星猫险导演丹·福格尔曼负责编剧、执导，2017年春天开始制作。背景在纽约的西班牙郊区，奥斯卡·伊萨克饰演的角色将串联起几代人的爱情故事。
星猫历险记之古城大冒险
奥斯卡·伊萨克将出演新片《一生》(Life Itself，星猫险暂译)，星猫险导演丹·福格尔曼负责编剧、执导，2017年春天开始制作。背景在纽约的西班牙郊区，奥斯卡·伊萨克饰演的角色将串联起几代人的爱情故事。
回复 :两名农夫搭木筏至一孤岛兜售鸡鸭，岛上气氛诡异，两人胆寒之下突遇一群面具人袭击，农夫一死一降，皆被岛上屠夫解体后当做食物分发给饥肠辘辘的岛民。原来此岛辖属大家乡，不知何时岛民开始以人肉为食，保安队负责维持治安与食物配给。密探九九九（徐少强 饰）为追踪江洋大盗劳力士（黄锦燊 饰）与一自称“包铁胆”的蟊贼登岛，击倒岛上屠夫后九九九拜访大家乡保安队长（高雄 饰），队长将其引至屠场，九九九力战群凶后负伤逃脱，在一民女阿莲家调养之后向队长求证，然而一无所获。先前劳力士选择大家乡任保安副队长，以求洗心革面，谁知事与愿违却做起了吃人的勾当，劳力士几次计划向岛外求援却全被破坏，这次向九九九报警仍不被理睬，无奈之下放出被囚的包铁胆，自己反被队长杀死。九九九又一次经历围攻而大难不死，他决定和包铁胆、阿莲姐弟一起逃离食人岛……
郭彪
回复 :美国的一个小镇，Jefferson Smith（詹姆斯·斯图尔特 James Stewart饰）是当地的童子军的首领，深受青少年们的喜爱，被选为新的参议员，来到了华盛顿。遇到了他父亲的老朋友，同为参议员的Joseph Paine（克劳德·雷恩斯 Claude Rains饰），并且迷上了Joseph的漂亮女儿。单纯的Jefferson从来没来过华盛顿，在华盛顿闹了不少笑话，被媒体纷纷取笑。Joseph让Jefferson起草一个提案，并让他的女秘书Clarissa Saunders（琪恩·亚瑟 Jean Arthur 饰）协助Jefferson。然而Jefferson却发现，他的这个所谓参议员不过是其他老谋深算的参议员手中的木偶，他发现了他们一个巨大的阴谋。Jefferson决定以自己单薄的力量来对抗那群人，来改变这个腐败的政治环境。到底他能否成功？史密斯先生的华盛顿之旅会如何结束？本片获第11届奥斯卡10项提名，赢得最佳原创剧本一奖。
贾斯汀
回复 :Volker Schlöndorff transposes Bertolt Brecht’s late-expressionist work to latter-day 1969. Poet and anarchist Baal lives in an attic and reads his poems to cab drivers. At first feted and later rejected by bourgeois society, Baal roams through forests and along motorways, greedy for schnapps, cigarettes, women and men: ‘You have to let out the beast, let him out into the sunlight.’ After impregnating a young actress he soon comes to regard her as a millstone round his neck. He stabs a friend to death and dies alone. ‘You are useless, mangy and wild, you beast, you crawl through the lowest boughs of the tree.’The film takes youthful impetuousness and hatred of oppression as its subject and also ponders the cult of genius and sexual morals. Rainer Werner Fassbinder simultaneously plays both Baal and himself and is surrounded by many actors who were later to perform in his own films. After the film was broadcast on West German television, Brecht’s widow Helene Weigel prohibited any further screenings, arguing that the social circumstances engendering Baal’s rebelliousness had not been adequately explained.
